|
|
|
CryoSat Failure Analysed - KOMPSAT-2 Launch in Spring 2006
Bremen, Germany, December 21, 2005
The root
cause of the CryoSat failure on October 8, 2005 has been unambiguously
identified and corrective measures for Rockot`s return-to-flight are
now under way for the safe launch of Kompsat-2 in the second quarter of
2006, as agreed between the Korea Aerospace Research Institute and
Eurockot Launch Services. Human error and not an inherent design flaw
of the launch vehicle caused the failure.
On October 8, 2005 the launch of ESA's CryoSat satellite on board a
Rockot launch vehicle had ended in failure. Due to an anomaly towards
the end of the planned 2nd stage operations and approximately five
minutes after lift-off, the launch vehicle had automatically terminated
its mission. The combined stack of the launch vehicle (2nd, 3rd stage)
and the CryoSat spacecraft had impacted into the Arctic Ocean.
A Russian State Commission including members from Khrunichev (the
Launch Vehicle contractor), Khartron (the Control System
subcontractor), the Russian Federal Space Agency, Space Forces as well
as Russian industrial representatives was convened immediately after
the mishap. Its investigation work has been concluded by issuing a
commission report including recommendations. A summary of the findings
of the Russian State Commission final report was presented to Eurockot
and ESA on November 3, 2005 in Moscow.
In parallel to the Russian State Commission investigation, a Eurockot
Failure Review Board was formed to review the Russian State Commission
investigation results as well as its conclusions and recommendations.
This resulted in an independent report, drawing its own conclusions and
recommendations. The board was co-chaired by Eurockot and Khrunichev
senior managers and comprised of experts from Eurockot, Khrunichev and
EADS Space Transportation. The European Space Agency (ESA), to whom the
CryoSat satellite belongs, participated within the Eurockot Board as
observers.
The launch failure was ultimately caused by the 2nd stage main engine
not being shut down at the correct time, leading to an engine burn
until the propellants were depleted. Due to this incorrect shut down,
an engine failure occurred resulting in a lateral force on the launch
vehicle. This resulted in unstable flight causing the vehicle flight
angles to exceed allowable limits. In accordance with the flight
programme, the on-board computer automatically terminated the mission
at 308s into the flight.
As a consequence, the 2nd stage was not separated from the 3rd stage
and the 3rd stage main engine was not ignited. The whole stack of 2nd
stage, 3rd stage and CryoSat spacecraft dropped within the nominal drop
area of the second stage.
Analysis of the telemetry data indicates that the 1st stage performed
nominally. The 2nd stage performed nominally until main engine shut
down was to occur.
Telemetry records show that the command to shut down the 2nd stage main
engine by the on-board computer was generated correctly. However for
this shut down command to be carried out, a further condition must be
met. This requires that the pressurisation of the low pressure tank of
the 3rd stage Breeze be fully completed before the shut down command
can be carried out. Due to human error, the completion time of the
pressurisation sequence for the CryoSat launch was erroneously
specified and occurred after the shut down command was generated and
therefore it was not carried out. In nominal mission cases, this 3rd
stage pressurisation is completed well before the 2nd stage main engine
shut down command is generated. This error had also not been identified
by existing verification and testing procedures.
The Eurockot Review Board concurs fully with the Russian State
Commission's findings of the root cause. Furthermore the Eurockot
Review Board fully agrees with the Russian State Commission's proposed
return-to-flight measures. In
summary, four aspects will be improved and implemented for
return-to-flight. Firstly, the pressurisation timeline will in
the future be constrained within a fixed window within the overall
mission timeline. Improved and more thorough verification procedures
will be introduced when generating the mission timeline input data both
at Khrunichev and the control system subcontractor Khartron.
Additionally improved testing during 'electronic launch' simulation at
the Control System subcontractor shall be introduced. Finally, the
Eurockot Review Board has recommended that further measures be
undertaken to provide improved visibility of mission peculiar aspects
of future missions. The Eurockot Review Board will monitor that
these return-to-flight measures and their resulting action items have
been correctly implemented in a series of project meetings and reviews
prior to the next launch of Rockot, which is for the Kompsat-2
spacecraft in 2Q 2006. Furthermore, the Russian State Commission, as
part of the Flight and Launch Readiness Reviews for the Kompsat-2
launch, will formally provide the go-ahead for launch. The
Kompsat-2 launch will be followed by the ESA missions GOCE, SMOS and
Proba-2 in 2007, in which year Eurockot will also launch an earth
observation satellite for an undisclosed customer.
|
|
|